我做了一个剽窃曝光网站，
会按我自己的标准放上剽窃事件，
目前有陈燕妮剽窃杜欣欣案，
肖艳剽窃杜欣欣案，
还有《健康导刊》剽窃岑岚案。
这里是网址

剽窃曝光
这只是一个试验，
对我个人而言，
揭露剽窃是最大的好戏，
怎么可以不看，
而网上论坛都各有各的不自由之处，
还是自己找个地方看最好。
如果顺便能打击一下这些剽窃之人就更好了。

按照我对法律的理解，
论坛和私人网页的转载转贴不违法，
所以我不赞同廖康的声明的这一部分。
这个剽窃曝光网站几乎没有原创，
多是转载的，
只要在网路上发表了的，
和剽窃有关的都有可能被转载。
这是我的私人网站，
按照法律完全可以转载任何网上的东西。

这里是网站介绍，
里面有关于转载的讨论：

本网站专门曝光有确凿证据的剽窃事件，欢迎被剽窃的作者揭露剽窃事件，
也欢迎被指控剽窃者申诉和反击。我们只给出事实和证据，不加入自己的看
法和评论。我们不接受只有指控没有证据的事件。

根据美国专利法的以下段落，我们不认为在论坛或非盈利性质的个人网页转
载文章是违法行为：

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use38

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair
use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in
copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that
section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship,
or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining
whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair
use the factors to be considered shall include —

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such
use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation
to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value
of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding
of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the
above factors.