请问青冈、xw等鸟专家,这是什么鸟?离得很远,相机不好(6.0-72mm,12xZoom)技术更糟,鸟很漂亮。还看到红鸟,没有拍到。常常有见到一群群的鸟,但漂亮的都是单只的,为什么?
还是秋日
- Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/19/2008
Blue Jay, 北美最通俗的鸟之一,红的应是Northern Cardinal
当然,最通俗的是American Robin:
http://www.mayacafe.com/forum/topic1sp.php3?tkey=1105715441
青冈估计得查书才知道:)
- Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/19/2008
Blue Jay (冠蓝鸦),a common bird in America. - Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/20/2008
草叶的那张不错。知道相机不适合照鸟偏跟自己过不去。
漂亮的是male。
rzp wrote: - Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/20/2008
谢谢:) 还不适合照花和任何特写。是否长镜头是解决方法?
同样是傻瓜机照法,还是有许多提高的余地。你的那些秋景有没有在计算机上再处理过?
moab wrote:
草叶的那张不错。知道相机不适合照鸟偏跟自己过不去。
漂亮的是male。
rzp wrote:
谢xw和青冈,通俗是说很常见吧,不过每次都不是一群的。他们是候鸟吗? - posted on 10/20/2008
Blue Jay是留鸟,雪中蓝鸦才漂亮呢。还有你说的红鸟,祖红雀,也
是留鸟。知更鸟是候鸟,看家看草坪的,早飞南方去了。
群鸟也有很漂亮的,只是你不太留意。比如Purple Martin.
还有一种鸟,象画一样美色Painted Bunting:
林中常见的。
红的还有一种,Scarlet Tanager也很艳丽。
细观的话,鸟不仅的雄雌有别,就是未成鸟也有别。上面说过了。
rzp wrote: - Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/20/2008
谢xw,很少到林子里去所以少见多怪了:)。Purple Martin挺像每年经过的候鸟有一回占了满院,照了许多不大清楚的相。不细看黑丘丘一片,细看背上泛蓝,还是挺漂亮的。不过还是比不上你相片这种。跟xw在咖啡里算邻居了,这附近有什么观鸟的好林子?前两天在植物园展柜里见到很多种米,还有介绍squash,回头帖帖squash的笔记。
- Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/21/2008
爱情鸟 - Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/21/2008
爱情鸟? 讲来听听?我以为爱情鸟是那种成双出对的呢?象这鹦鹉:
fanghuzhai wrote:
爱情鸟 - Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/23/2008
Not necessarily. You need a macro lens for flowers, and a medium telephoto for head and shoulder shots.
All digital photos need post-processing, be it in-camera or on-computer. I always set the camera setting to neutral, and then adjust the photos on a computer to what I see/like.
rzp wrote:
谢谢:) 还不适合照花和任何特写。是否长镜头是解决方法?
同样是傻瓜机照法,还是有许多提高的余地。你的那些秋景有没有在计算机上再处理过?
- posted on 10/23/2008
Thanks! Would you care to give some detailed suggustion? For the one I am using now canon S3 IS, is there macro lens and/or medium telephoto available? Canon does offer the following lens, are there macro / medium telephoto lens?
Also, what do you mean setting the camera setting to neutral?
Thanks a lot!
Wide Converter WC-DC58A
Converts the focal length of the body lens by a factor of
approximately 0.75 when attached.
Tele-converter TC-DC58B
Converts the focal length of the body lens by a factor of approximately 1.5 when attached.
Close-up Lens 500D (58mm)
This lens can be used to take close-ups of subjects that are 35 - 50 cm (1.1 - 1.6 ft.) (at maximum telephoto) from the front of the lens.
Lens Adapter/Lens Hood Set LAH-DC20
This conversion lens adapter and hood set is required for mounting the wide converter, tele-converter or close-up lens mentioned above to the camera.
moab wrote:
Not necessarily. You need a macro lens for flowers, and a medium telephoto for head and shoulder shots.
All digital photos need post-processing, be it in-camera or on-computer. I always set the camera setting to neutral, and then adjust the photos on a computer to what I see/like.
rzp wrote:
谢谢:) 还不适合照花和任何特写。是否长镜头是解决方法?
同样是傻瓜机照法,还是有许多提高的余地。你的那些秋景有没有在计算机上再处理过?
- Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/23/2008
鸟的灵气,左顾右盼的眼神,要拍到她们的倩影,还真不那么容易!
这是什么鸟? - Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/23/2008
哇塞,连旁边的蜘蛛网都这么清楚,是用什么镜头在多远处拍的?谢谢。
能否将相片稍微弄小点?
玛塞 wrote:
鸟的灵气,左顾右盼的眼神,要拍到她们的倩影,还真不那么容易!
这是什么鸟? - posted on 10/23/2008
I am not familiar with point and shoot cameras. That being said, your S3 should have a "macro" mode, which allows close focusing to achieve high magnification ratio. In 35mm terms, medium telephoto is about 85mm. I don't know the convertion factor of focal lengths from S3 to 35mm terms. For that type of camera it probably doesn't matter much anyway. I's day zoom the lens out no more than 1/3 for portrait.
You didn't get a good shot of the birds because that camera can't focus fast enough, can't maintain the focus while the subject was moving (focus tracking), and can't snap the picture fast enough (shutter lag). That's what differentiates a digital SLR camera from a point and shoot ( the "megapixel" number is misleading)
If I were you I would either stay with the S3, realizing its limitations and try to make the best of it, or switch to a digital SLR camera. I wouldn't recommend buying those "adaptors" and "lenses" you researched because you are just wasting money.
rzp wrote:
Thanks! Would you care to give some detailed suggustion? For the one I am using now http://web.canon.jp/imaging/pss3is/overview-e.html">canon S3 IS, is there macro lens and/or medium telephoto available? Canon does offer the following lens, are there macro / medium telephoto lens?
Also, what do you mean setting the camera setting to neutral?
Thanks a lot!
Wide Converter WC-DC58A
http://web.canon.jp/imaging/pss3is/img/package/wc-dc58a.jpg" align="left"> Converts the focal length of the body lens by a factor of
approximately 0.75 when attached.
Tele-converter TC-DC58B
http://web.canon.jp/imaging/pss3is/img/package/tc-dc58b.jpg" align="left"> Converts the focal length of the body lens by a factor of approximately 1.5 when attached.
Close-up Lens 500D (58mm)
http://web.canon.jp/imaging/pss3is/img/package/closeup-500d58.jpg" align="left"> This lens can be used to take close-ups of subjects that are 35 - 50 cm (1.1 - 1.6 ft.) (at maximum telephoto) from the front of the lens.
Lens Adapter/Lens Hood Set LAH-DC20
http://web.canon.jp/imaging/pss3is/img/package/lah-dc20.jpg" align="left"> This conversion lens adapter and hood set is required for mounting the wide converter, tele-converter or close-up lens mentioned above to the camera.
moab wrote:
Not necessarily. You need a macro lens for flowers, and a medium telephoto for head and shoulder shots.
All digital photos need post-processing, be it in-camera or on-computer. I always set the camera setting to neutral, and then adjust the photos on a computer to what I see/like.
rzp wrote:
谢谢:) 还不适合照花和任何特写。是否长镜头是解决方法?
同样是傻瓜机照法,还是有许多提高的余地。你的那些秋景有没有在计算机上再处理过?
- Re: 还是秋日(图)-- 请问这是什么鸟?posted on 10/24/2008
我用的是Nikon Coolpix 8800.不过是两年前的产品,精密的傻瓜机.
拍鸟是动态的,又是远距离,聚焦要又快又准,很刺激,象打猎.这个傻瓜机做到了.
看详细的,可google上查一下.
Please paste HTML code and press Enter.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation