非党派组织“税务政策中心”(Tax Policy Center)的税务专家威廉斯(Roberton Williams)与葛莱克顿(Howard Gleckman),分析奥巴马和马凯恩各自提出的税务计划之后,于9月15日发表一份研究报告----“2008年总统候选人税务计划的最新分析”。税务政策中心由非党派的“城市研究所”(Urban Institute)和保守派的“布鲁金斯研究院”(Brookings Institution)联合设立,其立场应该比其它一些研究机构和个人更为客观公正,至少不会偏向民主党。
Parade杂志把这份研究报告的结论,简化成下面一分表格。
家庭年收入---------------奥巴马计划--------------马凯恩计划
低于1万9000元-----------减税567元--------------减税21元
1万9000-3万7600元-------减税892元--------------减税118元
3万7600-6万6400元-------减税1118元-------------减税325元
6万6400-11万1600元------减税1264元-------------减税994元
11万1600-16万1000元-----减税2135元-------------减税2584元
16万1000-22万7000元-----减税2796元-------------减税4437元
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
22万7000-60万3400元-----加税121元--------------减税8154元
60万3400-287万元--------加税9万3709元----------减税4万8862元
287万元以上-------------加税54万2882元----------减税29万0708元
该报告总结说:“奥巴马的计划会使低收入和中等收入家庭的纳税减少,但会显着提高高收入者的赋税,中等收入纳税者的税后收入会增加约5%,即每年2200元。占全国总人口1%的最高收入者,税后收入会减少1.5%,或1万9000元。”
“到2012年,马凯恩的计划会使中等收入纳税人的税后收入平均增加约3%,即每年1400元。但与奥巴马形成鲜明对比的是,马凯恩会使收入最高的1%的人的税后收入平均增加9.5%,即超过12万5000元。”
-------------------
摘录自:
http://cnd.org/my/modules/wfsection/article.php%3Farticleid=20991
- Re: ZT 2008年总统候选人税务计划的最新分析posted on 10/24/2008
Empty promise.
More spending and less tax. The equation does not hold.
- Re: You cannot help the poor by destroying the richposted on 10/24/2008
***You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
***You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
***You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
***You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
***You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.
Abraham Lincoln - posted on 10/24/2008
tom wrote:
***You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
***You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
***You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
***You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
***You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.
Abraham Lincoln
Educate me please how this is different from other Republican cliché?
Remember Lincoln is not God, just one of those 40+ fortunate knuckleheads.
- Re: You cannot help the poor by destroying the richposted on 10/24/2008
then show me how to help the poor by destroying the rich. History? Theory? Proposal? Any insight?
- Re: You cannot help the poor by destroying the richposted on 10/24/2008
Welcome to café, just spend your precious time poking around here,there are likely more than what your appetite is hungered for.
Please paste HTML code and press Enter.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation