这张照片是她早上刚起床时拍摄的?是睡衣还是精神病院的病号服?
Sexual Politics is a classic feminist text written by Kate Millett, said to be "the first book of academic feminist literary criticism",[1] and "one of the first feminist books of this decade to raise nationwide male ire".[2]
Based on her PhD dissertation, it was published in 1970. Millet argues that "sex has a frequently neglected political aspect" and goes on to discuss the role that patriarchy plays in sexual relations, looking especially at the works of D. H. Lawrence, Henry Miller, and Norman Mailer. Millet argues that these authors view and discuss sex in a patriarchal and sexist way. In contrast, she applauds the more nuanced gender politics of homosexual writer Jean Genet. Other writers discussed at length include Sigmund Freud, George Meredith, John Ruskin, and John Stuart Mill.
"[T]here is no remedy to sexual politics in marriage."
– (147)
Sexual Politics was an important theoretical touchstone for the second wave feminism of the '70s. It was also extremely controversial. Norman Mailer, whose work, especially his 1965 novel An American Dream, had been criticised by Millett, wrote the article “The Prisoner of Sex” in Harper's Magazine in response, attacking Millett's claims and defending Miller and Lawrence.[3] More recently, Camille Paglia accused Sexual Politics of spawning what she sees as the excesses of women's studies departments, especially for attacks on the sexism of male authors of the Western canon.[4]
Doubleday's trade division, although it declined to reprint it when it went out of print briefly, said Sexual Politics was one of the 10 most important books that it had published in its 100 years of existence and included it in its anniversary anthology.[5]
- Re: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 03/17/2010
http://www.visionmagazine.com/archives/0210/Viewpoint_Sexual%20Politics%20The%20Rumor.html
一个抢着作针线活、会烹饪会侍候花草的男人真是让人心神荡漾,魂飞魄散...神啊,什么时候恩赐给我一个? - posted on 03/17/2010
http://www.katemillett.com/
这些 Art Colony都是在很冷的地方,这个在纽约上州,另外的那个在new hampshire的密林里,都不在温暖的海滩边....
The Loony-Bin Trip (1990) discusses her diagnosis of bipolar disorder, describing experiences with hospitalization and her decision to discontinue lithium therapy. Millett continues her efforts to debunk what she considers the myths surrounding psychiatry and advocated against forced psychiatric interventions as a representative of MindFreedom International at the United Nations regarding the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
勇敢的女人! forced psychiatric intervention!多少天才被强制送进精神病院!shutter Island就是很好的一部说明。
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Millett was involved in a dispute with the New York City authorities who wanted to evict her from her home at 295 Bowery as part of a massive redevelopment plan. Millett and others held out, but ultimately lost their battle. Their building was demolished, and the residents were re-located.[1] - posted on 03/17/2010
为什么性别研究总是跟马恩列斯研究放在一起,搞不懂,因为恩格斯的“家庭与婚姻”是开山之作?还是因为女性主义者总是社会改革的激进分子?
性别研究也必须提一下Rosa Luxemburg的贡献,年纪轻轻就9次入狱,无怨无悔。从前的人怎么如此执著,死不改悔?
卢森堡反对一战,对苏俄月革命提出异议,都是相当进步,眼光犀利的。
her famous quote: Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters.
.......
摘自百科:
罗莎•卢森堡是第二国际左派领袖之一,是德国共产党的主要创始人。1898年4月。这位杰出的女革命家和一位叫古斯塔夫•吕贝克的德国青年举行了庄严的婚礼。然而熟悉卢森堡的人们都知道,她真正的爱侣是约基希斯。这是怎么回事呢?
原来,这次婚礼是假的。其实卢森堡和约基希斯的爱情早在这次婚礼的八年前就开始萌发了。1890年夏天,约基希斯进入了苏黎世大学。此前,他参加秘密革命活动,不幸被捕。被强迫在沙俄军队服役。后来他巧妙地摆脱法网逃到了瑞士。恰好与流亡瑞士进入苏黎世大学学习的卢森堡相遇。他们研究时事,追求真理。共同的理想、志趣使这对出生波兰的青年男女来往频繁,日益亲密。
- posted on 03/17/2010
我是这么想的。先前,性还是很开放的,那时就象动物一样,也没有许多概念观念,
以后发现弃婴太多,溺婴普遍,最可怕的还是生计,只有战争一途了。
于是有一些思想家,宗教家就把性欲否定掉了。当然禁性也有增性的功力,不然圣
安东尼禁欲怎么会成了性欲的代名?毕竟只有成熟一些,性生产的后代更健全一些。
另外享受性生活的快乐也有一半在禁,成熟更有经验也对。
当性成了禁忌后,慢慢观念传得人都把性当洪水猛兽,当不可启齿的事情了。这时
候只有一些大胆的人冲破禁忌。这方面摩尔根,恩格斯当然值得一点。林奈与达尔
文在生物学范畴内提,弗洛依德一头扎进雾水,其实此诸君多是动口,还有一个尼
采也只是纸上谈。但一谈性,洪水猛兽一般就得要革命,可见禁忌之力!
完全接受社会陈见是很危险的,记得蒙田就说,把生育人的事情部位当作污秽不可
启齿,是一件荒诞的事。我一直想避孕套的发明,很了不起!至少它控制了人口,
使得人们对性爱生育有主动性。记得早先,女子十四五岁就结婚了,如果不避孕,
生育将是很可怕的数字,当然许多因生育而死,这个皇家都不例外。世界上很长一
段时间溺婴相当普遍,我读过明朝的禁令,还有北宋苏东坡的陈情。我一直想,当
性成为禁忌,那性生活,还有避孕的事情都没人认真去做,很可怕。
避孕套是很简单的事,法国人发明?我想,看菊豆里那么苦折腾,用肥皂,辣椒水,
中国古有天花粉什么的。如果用一截羊肠,是否就能达到同样的效果呢?这材料现
成,无须橡胶精致产品。还有性的活动性,哥伦布那一线提吊床,玛雅提的虐恋有
些过,但使用一些绳具未必就不更上一层楼。
达尔文说过一件事很有趣。他说人育种家禽家畜都很懂得择优,最佳交佩。而等到
自己的性爱,就糊涂起来了,哲人也不例外。多是荷尔蒙作怪?前回有人讽刺他为
结不结婚拟定多少条理,看来是他认真。我想,对性如果持放开一点的观念,肯定
会利大于弊。完全成禁忌,对身心不益!
当然有权威人士声称不能孕的性生活,整个是作伪,这怎么说呢?
- Re: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 03/17/2010
香港性别论坛,这里有中文的全面介绍。
http://www.hku.hk/hkcsp/ccex/text/studyguide/hkgender/glossary.html
二十世纪的女性主义思想以及运动跟着马克思主义一起流入边缘学科。 - Re: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 03/17/2010
谢xw跟我一起讨论这个话题。
当代,因为艾滋病的出现,6、70年代的性革命终结,社会转入保守。但艾滋病与性病的恐惧被保守社会有意夸大了。如果我们仔细研究艾滋病与性病数据,不难看出,相对于20世纪前妇女的痛苦,性病的危害并没那么严重。
神将男人女人切割开,然后又用性把他们重新粘合在一起,多么神奇美妙的连接! - RE: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 04/28/2011
回复 #6 mayati
- posted on 05/02/2011
maya wrote:
为什么性别研究总是跟马恩列斯研究放在一起,搞不懂,因为恩格斯的“家庭与婚姻”是开山之作?还是因为女性主义者总是社会改革的激进分子?
女性主义理论派别很多,只是马克思女性主义那一派和西马研究放一起。马克思主义在家庭问题上的立场确实是激进的。马克思主义人类学家一定会强调古人类女性懂的sex for food, collective sexual bargaining power在两性生理和心理进化上的重要性。
罗莎•卢森堡是第二国际左派领袖之一,是德国共产党的主要创始人。。。。然而熟悉卢森堡的人们都知道,她真正的爱侣是约基希斯。。。共同的理想、志趣使这对出生波兰的青年男女来往频繁,日益亲密。
列奥-约基希斯是立陶宛人,家里有钱,都被他用来干革命了。他和卢森堡之间的爱情很虐:男的以革命为生存动力,又不忠。后来两人分手,卢森堡和蔡特金的儿子同居,对方比她小十几岁。她应该是那种很有内在魅力的女人,因为她的外貌那时候因为牢狱生活,已经相当苍老了。卢森堡是被枪托击昏后拖出去毙掉扔到河里的,拖的过程中掉了一只鞋。约基希斯虽然不忠,却是为追查杀死卢森堡的凶手死掉的。蔡特金的那个儿子活了很长,见证了冷战,死在了加拿大。
阿伦特的第二任(最后一任)老公当年很年轻,是斯巴达克团的成员,算卢森堡的下级。
- Re: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 05/04/2011
知道老板娘爱看这个: - Re: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 05/11/2011
gz wrote:
知道老板娘爱看这个:
- RE: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 05/11/2011
回复 #10 gzno, please, I DO NOT like this…, and it is terribly made…
- RE: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 05/11/2011
回复 #11 mayaI thought you would enjoy SM ? :-)
- RE: Sexual Politics and Kate Millettposted on 05/11/2011
回复 #12 gznot this kind, you do not understand the fine line...
Please paste HTML code and press Enter.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation