NYT这篇不错。法国知识圈的反应让人倒胃口。
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/18/opinion/18clarke.html?hp
SINCE Sunday, when Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the head of the International Monetary Fund, was arrested on sexual assault charges in New York, French politicians have been loudly expressing their horror at his “violent” treatment at the hands of America’s criminal justice system. It must be a shock to them: the sight of a top French establishment figure being treated like an ordinary criminal is about as rare as a photo of the Queen of England in a bikini.
But they are not merely voicing their concern for an esteemed colleague; many of them are also thinking, “There but for the grace of God (or rather the grace of living in France and not the United States) go I.”
France may think it had a revolution, but in fact it just got a new, and even more powerful, elite. They believe themselves so indispensable to the running of the country that trying to topple one of them is a bit like threatening to shoot a prize racehorse for nibbling your lawn. You’re meant to shut up and let them nibble.
This is why the French establishment sees Mr. Strauss-Kahn — rather than the traumatized chambermaid the police say he attacked — as the victim. The same case would never have come out in the open in Paris. The woman would have been quietly asked whether she thought it was worth risking her job and her residence permit. She would have been reminded that it was her word against his, and frankly, whom would people believe? The witty, famous man with the influential friends, or the nobody?
French politicians are known to be serial seducers, and as a rule no one bothers them about it. It is widely accepted that a male politician can combine efficiency in his job with a tendency to leap into bed with as many people as possible. And maybe it’s true — the French eat a balanced diet and have lots of energy.
The danger is, however, that their reputation as “chauds lapins” (hot rabbits), to use the French term, can give them a sense of impunity. Surely it’s a thin line between thinking that because you’re powerful and famous, everyone will succumb to your charms, and assuming that anyone who resists is being unreasonable. By this logic, forcing yourself on an unwilling partner is only making her bow to the inevitable. It’s all very Louis XIV.
And it’s also a thin line between sexual impunity and legal impunity.
In 2004, Alain Juppé, a former prime minister, was convicted of corruption. He was given an 18-month suspended prison sentence and barred from public office for 10 years because, in the words of the judge, he had “betrayed the confidence of the people.” But he appealed and today is foreign minister, representing France on the world stage.
Jacques Chirac was implicated in the same scandal, but benefited from presidential immunity until 2007. Since then, all attempts to bring him to justice have stalled, and the whole affair is now treated as something of a running joke.
The most telling parallel with the Strauss-Kahn case is that of Roman Polanski. Whatever his talents as a filmmaker, he fled the United States to France in 1978 to avoid being sentenced for unlawful sex with a 13-year-old girl. When he was arrested in Switzerland in 2009, at the request of the American authorities, the whole of the French cultural establishment rose up to defend him.
At this year’s Césars ceremony (the French equivalent of the Oscars), Mr. Polanski received an award for “The Ghost Writer,” which, to quote France’s most respected newspaper, Le Monde, “marked his return to the family after his legal troubles.” They made it sound like a speeding ticket.
All of which leads me to my belief that even if Dominique Strauss-Kahn is convicted and has to serve time, he will someday return to France, publish his autobiography (which will, of course, be adapted for the big screen by Mr. Polanski) and eventually be made a government minister. Minister of gender equality, perhaps?
Stephen Clarke is the author of “1,000 Years of Annoying the French.”
- Re: Stephen Clarke: Dirty Old Manposted on 05/19/2011
写得挺痛快的哈。
想起可令吨那档子事。当时法国甚至欧洲也有非议,这种事在法国没什么了不起。不就是 office romance 吗,他们不懂为什么美国人这么叫真。美国人相对比较保守,还有很多人喜欢宣扬他们的 family value 。 当然可令吨和炉温司机是两厢情愿。和 DSK 的性质不同。在 sexual harrasment 这件事上美国抓得更紧,不能让弱者受欺负。挺好的。单位里每两年就要学习考试一次反对各种歧视和 harrasment 的法规,虽然很形式化很繁琐,但想想还是觉得该支持。作为少数族裔的,我们也都是受益者。 - Re: Stephen Clarke: Dirty Old Manposted on 05/19/2011
这和保守不保守有啥关系啊。法国的那些什么著名公共知识分子讲的话,让人觉得他们是真心认为一个人的道德水准和他的知识以及权力地位成正比,活该被美国人刻薄。
Please paste HTML code and press Enter.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation