- History will remember him not as a communist who preached his faith, or a sociologist who ostensibly prescribed for a society, but a Chinese who was willing to give up his own life to bring equality and happiness to China.
非常不同意这样的观点. 历史不能这样记住方志敏. 你个人可以这样记住(所以, 如果写成 I will remember him not as...没有任何问题). 历史不是选择性的记录. 我们个人可以为了个人需要而选择性地"断章取义"或者淡化历史背景. 但是历史是客观全面的. 设想一下, 如果用上面的历史观,那么是不是可以说历史将只记住希特勒是一个伟大的爱国者? 或者伟大的民族主义者? 他作为纳粹, 他的爱国行为对其他人犯下罪行历史就可以不管了? 这里我在类比两个例子的历史观,方和希两人之间没有什么可类比的.
在儿童教育中, 由于孩子不能理解复杂事物, 我们可以采用简单化历史的方法, 甚至断章取义, 以达到特殊的教育目的. 对待成熟的成年人, 这样的历史观是不行的. 一方面, 它和人们认识到十分复杂的社会真实性对不上号;另一方面它让人们的头脑简单化理想化, 阻止人们走向成熟.
历史记住的方志敏是一位共产党员, 革命烈士, 不是爱国烈士. 历史记住了方志敏有一篇充满爱国主义的文章. 其中的爱国之情和爱国之心(不是爱国思想和行为)的文学风格式的表达,符合很多人的心理, 被人喜爱.
而且, 忠于历史也是忠于本人的意愿. 方志敏特别在信封上写到(大意), 文章就是告诉人们,某某XXX员(指共产党员,他自己)也是爱国的.
风子 wrote:
I'm of the opinion that Mr. Fang, in his word and deed, embodies a universal value shared by mankind. That is, freedom, equality and independence of individual and national sovereignty are a cause that is worth self-sacrifice. Because he lived and died by this principle, he and his writings will be remembered as such. His party affiliation, his personal view on the root of evils ravaging China at the time, and the means by which he fought for freedom and independence for the greater part of the society, while all subject to further debate and scrutiny, are not nearly as important. History will remember him not as a communist who preached his faith, or a sociologist who ostensibly prescribed for a society, but a Chinese who was willing to give up his own life to bring equality and happiness to China.
st dude