ժҪ BBSģͣóڷʽȶڶͻоʱĸƵʼʽ
ؼ BBSģͣʱ
ŻķٷչͨϢԽԽռ罻кܶ࣬BBSӦúܹ㷺һ֡BBSBulletin Board SystemǵӹϵͳӢд£ظ£ʽϢʹʮַ㡣ĿǰΪֹƺͶԹǶȶBBSоѾܶˣBBSĶоĹȽټͼڿҪص£ЧBBSѧģͣBBS֮ϵBBSĹˮƽվķԼָBBSıдʮҪۺʵ塣
1 BBSصij
BBSΪһӵ罻ϵͳֲͬȨĹԱԡӵйʡǿͨˮ߹ɣDZˮߡд֡ˮߡҷӣءΪ˼ģͣȶԵBBSһЩӲԹ涨:
һBBS̶ǹ̶BBSdzȶݻͷܵȷصӰ죬дһо
ڶBBSֻעûŷȨԣ̶£עûӵзȨʺͷԤ⣬ƣBBSԵĺ±ڴ£IJֵʹעûʡ
BBS治ͻ¼ԼڼյӰ졣ǶĽһ涨ɴ˿ɼʱΡʱѯСְԵΪBBS治ڱоΧ֮ڡ
ʵеBBSһڵڶԷעûֻṩȨҲٲṩȨڳʱͳ£Ϊųأ涨DZҪġ۵BBS涼ȫģָ
2 BBSڷо
һBBSӽգ¿ԷΪڡȶں˥ΡڵʰͻȲֵؽΪͬǡֱӽBBSڵĺģͣ
һBBṢʵҪܵӰ죺һѾʹߣǻᷴطʣʹ÷ӣһ棬ûзʹעûڷʵĿԣӡԿ̷dz˿ѡVerhulstLogistic˿ģ֮͡ûMalthusģΪκһBBSķܳķбעʣҪһ
һվзΪ BBSķΪ ΪзBBS߷ռıޣ ΪVerhulst˿ģеıϵ Ϊʱ䣬Եọ̃
1
עʼ
2
õ̵Ľ⣺
3
ͼ
ͼ һԵĹյ㣬ʱ仯ʴﵽԺ
4
ϣ2У
5
ʱﵽʡ
3 BBSȶģ
ȶڣһBBSѾγɴȶȺ壬ٶȻߵĹɱҲ̶ʱBBSϵУбҪӽзۣҪBBSķͻǵBBSģͲþĿǰеĶ
¼ͻΪĸ¡½ʹBBS涥ոȺ˳ϵУ͵BBSΪӸʱСʱδµܱ£Ϊӵ
ϸִBBSϵͳټIJϵԭĸ£δµBBSײʵٵõĸʺСΪѾ
ݺIJͬĵʺͻ˴ͬҪָǣӵʵݻBoard ManagerӼϵĵȼ־з̫࣬ǿȱɲԣ BBSȶģǰջʱ䲻ͬΪǿͨˮǼʱӸֲָͳпԿǷʵģֱֲΪ
ǿ: 6
ͨ: 7
ˮ ˮӲԹ涨ΪûлȻҲûлʱ估ֲ
67ʽ ʵʳģַǿͨͨУ
8
ԼһҪرעǣ ĺ岢ģʵʻʱǰ˶DzֻɹѾͳơ
ٿǿͨˮĵֱѭΪ Poissoṇöɾ»ݴˣɽʱ Ϊ
9
9ĺΪʱٶȳɷȣͬʱĹͬ ǵǾһʱ̴ ¸
ˣ˷ǿɿأûйԱƽȣʡʱʱأԣͬʡʱ以Ӱ죩BBSѧģ͵ĹԿBBSģһ൱ӵϵͳȡһоо
4 һо
һǿɿƽBBSģֻͣͨѭΪ PoissoṇʱӲΪ ĸֲָʱ Ƶƽ
һʱ ڣΪ Ϊ
10
ڻʱӲΪ ĸֲָһʱ ûлĸ
11
һʱ ֻһĸ
12
ǰǡ λĸ
13
ѧ
(14)
֪һγΪ ʱһBBSѧΪ
15
ƽΪ
16
һʵͳƵóȻԼ2050֮䡣
⣬ǻԵóһЩȤ
ʱΪ лʱķֲ֪Ӧǣ
17
лʱʱ ѧ
18
18ʽʵʺԵģӵʧһֿܵĻʱҪ С
ԵõÿBBSдڿɻظ״̬ʵǴǰҳȽظ״̬ƽʱΪ
19
5
BBSģ൱ӵģҵĹֻһʼֵýһо磬ߵʽ⡢BBSڵľȷģ֮ͬ͡Ӱ졢߶BBSƻԲߵȵȣⶼһĹ
1 J.W.Cohen.The single server queue.North-Holland Publishing Company,1982
2 ͬôѧѧ.ߵѧ ߵȽ,1996
3 Դ.ѧģ ߵȽ,1993
4 .Ŷۻ ɶƼѧ,1998
- Re: 公式资料posted on 11/17/2004
- Re: 公式资料posted on 11/17/2004
- Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/17/2004
BBS, Best Bull Shit? :) - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/17/2004
Ǻǣ¥ϵĸЦ^_^ - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/17/2004
ûʲôѧ,ǰij
Ǻ - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
ãأҲضһöû˸һ¡:) - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
, Ǿһ. ʦ̸, ̸DNA˫,ʫ̸, ѧ̸̸⼼.
ţٱ֤ţǺõ, ͬѼ,Ҳ:-)
Fengzi wrote:
ãأҲضһöû˸һ¡:) - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
ҰתCNDˣһЩ
wrote:
, Ǿһ. ʦ̸, ̸DNA˫,ʫ̸, ѧ̸̸⼼.
ţٱ֤ţǺõ, ͬѼ,Ҳ:-)
Fengzi wrote:
ãأҲضһöû˸һ¡:) - Re: 对牛弹琴牛受用?posted on 11/18/2004
õĿ»dzţŵĵ˰ɣ:)
wrote:
ţٱ֤ţǺõ, - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
Comments:
The assumption of this model is fundamentally wrong because of the Poisson distribution for the Web model. - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
ȫû:)
ֻǽôһģõЩۣȻֻdzʵʻԶԺܽģ - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
! ֧...
(11/17/05 re: fanghuzhai photo) - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/18/2004
λ̨ƺͳģ֪͡ԸԸһĿѧģ͡ٶŵһֲ̬ƵĻôִƽķֲʼϡ˫ͣԿɼٶֲ̬ڽκһ壩ںߣǷһЧͳƺģأֲ̬ͬʲôϵأ߿ɷתǷIJֵĴС֮ͬĹϵ塭
оǧҪ㹫ñCIAɱ:) - posted on 11/18/2004
Good try. I copy a Prof.'s comments from CND for you as well in case you can see http://www.cnd.org
PS. The wrong of your model is not the arrival assumption but the service assumption.
From yedite
The Poisson arrival assumption itself is not wrong, but it should be in the context of Markovian queueing network model, and further adjusted for multiplicative effects between the nodes (websites) in the network. The model, as is presented, is too simplistic for any meaningful analysis.
- posted on 11/19/2004
¿һ£ܶûС͡ĵط֪ʲô˼
BBSķҪͬʱٿһʹκͲģʵĹʽ1еϵkӦзӦk˹ϵĻôk<0ʱBBSڵ˿ʵǴһʼһ̶֮½ģΪ0ʱBBS˿ڽҲ١
VerhulstLogistic˿ģԤӿBBSϣ⽫Ǵ֮ͻȻע룬Ҫ֪ԭ˿ģǸȻֳеģBBS棬ҵȻֳƵעӵ
Ҳûʱ˵ЩʣϰȥˣԺġ - posted on 11/19/2004
toĩ:Աѧ˼ˣҲûʲô֣ԼԼ:)
to Fengzi:ллҿһ㶼^_^ǺķԺô˵ģһȤɲоģоҲò
to Ҫʲôͬʲô̬Ⱥ˵ģing
to CappuccinoǽڵۺпϣԺøһM/Gģ
to ߸XXX ĵطһЩ壬һʱȥҲû˵еڵģͻ̫֦Ҷˣ취ǽȥ
ںdzæˣæҲãһһ쵽ţҪDzдЩ˵˵Ķг:( - posted on 11/19/2004
ԽԽ.ջǰĸ:-)
ҺϲϷ. ĵط,Ҫ,IDEA,ͺ. дʲôĿ,.
ָ:Ͳ̸רҵ,㿪ʼŪ֮,ò˶һŪ,˾û. רҵרҵ,dzСĵػĥ˱һ,˵ʹ˻ܼŭԷ. Ϸĸо, Ͷ:-)
wrote:
λ̨ƺͳģ֪͡ԸԸһĿѧģ͡ٶŵһֲ̬ƵĻôִƽķֲʼϡ˫ͣԿɼٶֲ̬ڽκһ壩ںߣǷһЧͳƺģأֲ̬ͬʲôϵأ߿ɷתǷIJֵĴС֮ͬĹϵ塭
оǧҪ㹫ñCIAɱ:) - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/19/2004
̨ wrote:
to Ҫʲôͬʲô̬Ⱥ˵ģing
黰,˭黰Ҷö:-))))) - Re: BBS的数学模型posted on 11/19/2004
Ҳ֪,ΪʲôƵ˲ܻӭ!ԼҲѧߵѧ!? - posted on 11/20/2004
For a Poisson process, it is not only meant to the hits only.
The significance of the model depends on what the people think.
Indeed, Markovian queueing network models are used extentively for many applications. Any un-deterministic process(es) in real life can be modelled with it. Data traffic, communication traffic, real highway/street traffic, ferry traffic, accidents, events, etc. all can be modelled this way.
That was my impression too, before I became good at it. Then I got bored, and decided to study law. Guess what? Law was even more boring. So, now I am in business management.
Internet visit models are plenty. One class is internet pricing based on visit modeling. Marginal visit pricing has been propsoed but not very successful in practice.
So NJ is doing insurance? Must be very fun!
Stochastic programming models are wdiely researched and with limited use in financial engineering. The Black-Scholes model is well recognized as a close form solution technique with stationary stochstic processes (I should mention Merton as well). In reality, it is hardly to find any stationary processes. Ito processes could be a bit more useful for some cases.
None of the stochastic models are good for finding close form solutions when fixed transaction costs are taken into consideration.
My opinion for the research is to use mixed interger programming considering non-stationary movements (mean, variance or semivariance, ...) and good forecasts for the movements are critical.
Please paste HTML code and press Enter.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation
