在很多高档俱乐部里,新会员的申请必须得到全体会员的一致通过。在美国,co-op公寓,新的住户也要得到那栋楼的“居委会”同意之后才能搬进来。
咖啡店的质量是由咖啡店客人的素质决定的。为坚持当初的办店理念,我想筹备咖啡店管理委员会。除了已有的四个斑竹(玛雅、xw、阿姗、马慧元)之外,请咖啡店其他几位资深客人参加咖啡店的监管工作。
这个委员会的工作包括:
1. 定期批准/否决新客人(以跟贴发贴为准)参加咖啡店讨论,原则是少数服从多数;
2. 协助四位斑竹ZT好文好贴,积极发表看法
3. 积极协助四位斑竹的版务工作
4. 商讨咖啡店基金的使用、未来发展计划
5. 积极提供咖啡店经营管理意见
初步拟定增加以下文友为咖啡店委员:dinglin2,令胡冲、笨笨、花正好、KC,八十一子、方壶斋、fengzi,wenzhai。这些文友都是咖啡店的老客人。希望你们与我一起来维护咖啡店的品质。并请你们与我能用MSN来取得经常的联系。
玛雅的MSN地址:mayacafe@prodigy.net
- posted on 06/12/2006
chole的建议太好了。在仔细读这篇文章。
……………………………………………………
玛雅该把咖啡店办成这样。
WHERE do you go when you want to know the latest business news, follow commodity prices, keep up with political gossip, find out what others think of a new book, or stay abreast of the latest scientific and technological developments? Today, the answer is obvious: you log on to the internet. Three centuries ago, the answer was just as easy: you went to a coffee-house. There, for the price of a cup of coffee, you could read the latest pamphlets, catch up on news and gossip, attend scientific lectures, strike business deals, or chat with like-minded people about literature or politics.
read on - http://www.economist.com/World/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2281736 - posted on 06/12/2006
The internet in a cup
Dec 18th 2003
Coffee fuelled the information exchanges of the 17th and 18th centuries
Bridgeman
WHERE do you go when you want to know the latest business news, follow commodity prices, keep up with political gossip, find out what others think of a new book, or stay abreast of the latest scientific and technological developments? Today, the answer is obvious: you log on to the internet. Three centuries ago, the answer was just as easy: you went to a coffee-house. There, for the price of a cup of coffee, you could read the latest pamphlets, catch up on news and gossip, attend scientific lectures, strike business deals, or chat with like-minded people about literature or politics.
The coffee-houses that sprang up across Europe, starting around 1650, functioned as information exchanges for writers, politicians, businessmen and scientists. Like today's websites, weblogs and discussion boards, coffee-houses were lively and often unreliable sources of information that typically specialised in a particular topic or political viewpoint. They were outlets for a stream of newsletters, pamphlets, advertising free-sheets and broadsides. Depending on the interests of their customers, some coffee-houses displayed commodity prices, share prices and shipping lists, whereas others provided foreign newsletters filled with coffee-house gossip from abroad.
Rumours, news and gossip were also carried between coffee-houses by their patrons, and sometimes runners would flit from one coffee-house to another within a particular city to report major events such as the outbreak of a war or the death of a head of state. Coffee-houses were centres of scientific education, literary and philosophical speculation, commercial innovation and, sometimes, political fermentation. Collectively, Europe's interconnected web of coffee-houses formed the internet of the Enlightenment era.
The great soberer
Coffee, the drink that fuelled this network, originated in the highlands of Ethiopia, where its beans were originally chewed rather than infused for their invigorating effects. It spread into the Islamic world during the 15th century, where it was embraced as an alternative to alcohol, which was forbidden (officially, at least) to Muslims. Coffee came to be regarded as the very antithesis of alcoholic drinks, sobering rather than intoxicating, stimulating mental activity and heightening perception rather than dulling the senses.
This reputation accompanied coffee as it spread into western Europe during the 17th century, at first as a medicine, and then as a social drink in the Arab tradition. An anonymous poem published in London in 1674 denounced wine as the “sweet Poison of the Treacherous Grape” that drowns “our Reason and our Souls”. Beer was condemned as “Foggy Ale” that “besieg'd our Brains”. Coffee, however, was heralded as
...that Grave and Wholesome Liquor,
that heals the Stomach, makes the Genius quicker,
Relieves the Memory, revives the Sad,
and cheers the Spirits, without making Mad.
The contrast between coffee and alcoholic drinks was reflected in the decor of the coffee-houses that began to appear in European cities, London in particular. They were adorned with bookshelves, mirrors, gilt-framed pictures and good furniture, in contrast to the rowdiness, gloom and squalor of taverns. According to custom, social differences were left at the coffee-house door, the practice of drinking healths was banned, and anyone who started a quarrel had to atone for it by buying an order of coffee for all present. In short, coffee-houses were calm, sober and well-ordered establishments that promoted polite conversation and discussion.
With a new rationalism abroad in the spheres of both philosophy and commerce, coffee was the ideal drink. Its popularity owed much to the growing middle class of information workers—clerks, merchants and businessmen—who did mental work in offices rather than performing physical labour in the open, and found that coffee sharpened their mental faculties. Such men were not rich enough to entertain lavishly at home, but could afford to spend a few pence a day on coffee. Coffee-houses provided a forum for education, debate and self-improvement. They were nicknamed “penny universities” in a contemporary English verse which observed: “So great a Universitie, I think there ne'er was any; In which you may a Scholar be, for spending of a Penny.”
“At the Café de Foy someone said that the king had taken a mistress...that she was a beautiful woman, the niece of the Duc de Noailles,” reads one report from the 1720s
As with modern websites, the coffee-houses you went to depended on your interests, for each coffee-house attracted a particular clientele, usually by virtue of its location. Though coffee-houses were also popular in Paris, Venice and Amsterdam, this characteristic was particularly notable in London, where 82 coffee-houses had been set up by 1663, and more than 500 by 1700. Coffee-houses around the Royal Exchange were frequented by businessmen; those around St James's and Westminster by politicians; those near St Paul's Cathedral by clergymen and theologians. Indeed, so closely were some coffee-houses associated with particular topics that the Tatler, a London newspaper founded in 1709, used the names of coffee-houses as subject headings for its articles. Its first issue declared:
All accounts of Gallantry, Pleasure, and Entertainment shall be under the Article of White's Chocolate-house; Poetry, under that of Will's Coffee-house; Learning, under...Grecian; Foreign and Domestick News, you will have from St James's Coffee-house.
Richard Steele, the Tatler's editor, gave its postal address as the Grecian coffee-house, which he used as his office. In the days before street numbering or regular postal services, it became a common practice to use a coffee-house as a mailing address. Regulars could pop in once or twice a day, hear the latest news, and check to see if any post awaited them. That said, most people frequented several coffee-houses, the choice of which reflected their range of interests. A merchant, for example, would generally oscillate between a financial coffee-house and one specialising in Baltic, West Indian or East Indian shipping. The wide-ranging interests of Robert Hooke, a scientist and polymath, were reflected in his visits to around 60 coffee-houses during the 1670s.
As the Tatler's categorisation suggests, the coffee-house most closely associated with science was the Grecian, the preferred coffee-house of the members of the Royal Society, Britain's pioneering scientific institution. On one occasion a group of scientists including Isaac Newton and Edmund Halley dissected a dolphin on the premises. Scientific lectures and experiments also took place in coffee-houses, such as the Marine, near St Paul's, which were frequented by sailors and navigators. Seamen and merchants realised that science could contribute to improvements in navigation, and hence to commercial success, whereas the scientists were keen to show the practical value of their work. It was in coffee-houses that commerce and new technology first became intertwined.
The more literary-minded, meanwhile, congregated at Will's coffee-house in Covent Garden, where for three decades the poet John Dryden and his circle reviewed and discussed the latest poems and plays. Samuel Pepys recorded in his diary on December 3rd 1663 that he had looked in at Will's and seen Dryden and “all the wits of the town” engaged in “very witty and pleasant discourse”. After Dryden's death many of the literatured shifted to Button's, which was frequented by Alexander Pope and Jonathan Swift, among others. Pope's poem “The Rape of the Lock” was based on coffee-house gossip, and discussions in coffee-houses inspired a new, more colloquial and less ponderous prose style, conversational in tone and clearly visible in the journalism of the day.
It was in coffee-houses that commerce and new technology first became intertwined
Other coffee-houses were hotbeds of financial innovation and experimentation, producing new business models in the form of innumerable novel variations on insurance, lottery or joint-stock schemes. The best-known example was the coffee-house opened in the late 1680s by Edward Lloyd. It became a meeting-place for ships' captains, shipowners and merchants, who went to hear the latest maritime news and to attend auctions of ships and their cargoes. Lloyd began to collect and summarise this information, supplemented with reports from a network of foreign correspondents, in the form of a regular newsletter, at first handwritten and later printed and sent to subscribers. Lloyd's thus became the natural meeting place for shipowners and the underwriters who insured their ships. Some underwriters began to rent booths at Lloyd's, and in 1771 a group of 79 of them collectively established the Society of Lloyd's, better known as Lloyd's of London.
Similarly, two coffee-houses near London's Royal Exchange, Jonathan's and Garraway's, were frequented by stockbrokers and jobbers. Attempts to regulate the membership of Jonathan's, by charging an annual subscription and barring non-members, were successfully blocked by traders who opposed such exclusivity. So in 1773 a group of traders from Jonathan's broke away and decamped to a new building, the forerunner of the London Stock Exchange. Garraway's was a less reputable coffee-house, home to auctions of all kinds and much dodgy dealing, particularly during the South Sea Bubble of 1719-21. It was said of Garraway's that no other establishment “fostered so great a quantity of dishonoured paper”.
Far more controversial than the coffee-houses' functions as centres of scientific, literary and business exchange, however, was their potential as centres of political dissent. Coffee's reputation as a seditious beverage goes back at least as far as 1511, the date of the first known attempt to ban the consumption of coffee, in Mecca. Thereafter, many attempts were made to prohibit coffee and coffee-houses in the Muslim world. Some claimed it was intoxicating and therefore subject to the same religious prohibition as alcohol. Others claimed it was harmful to the health. But the real problem was the coffee-houses' alarming potential for facilitating political discussion and activity.
This was the objection raised in a proclamation by Charles II of England in 1675. Coffee-houses, it declared, had produced
very evil and dangerous effects...for that in such Houses...divers False, Malitious and Scandalous Reports are devised and spread abroad, to the Defamation of His Majestie's Government, and to the Disturbance of the Peace and Quiet of the Realm.
The result was a public outcry, for coffee-houses had become central to commercial and political life. When it became clear that the proclamation would be widely ignored and the government's authority thus undermined, a further proclamation was issued, announcing that coffee-sellers would be allowed to stay in business for six months if they paid £500 and agreed to swear an oath of allegiance. But the fee and time limit were soon dropped in favour of vague demands that coffee-houses should refuse entry to spies and mischief-makers.
Dark rumours of plots and counter-plots swirled in London's coffee-houses, but they were also centres of informed political debate. Swift remarked that he was “not yet convinced that any Access to men in Power gives a man more Truth or Light than the Politicks of a Coffee House.” Miles's coffee-house was the meeting-place of a discussion group, founded in 1659 and known as the Amateur Parliament. Pepys observed that its debates were “the most ingeniose, and smart, that I ever heard, or expect to heare, and bandied with great eagernesse; the arguments in the Parliament howse were but flatte to it.” After debates, he noted, the group would hold a vote using a “wooden oracle”, or ballot-box—a novelty at the time.
Sweet smell of sedition
The contrast with France was striking. One French visitor to London, the Abbé Prévost, declared that coffee-houses, “where you have the right to read all the papers for and against the government”, were the “seats of English liberty”. Coffee-houses were popular in Paris, where 380 had been established by 1720. As in London, they were associated with particular topics or lines of business. But with strict curbs on press freedom and a bureaucratic system of state censorship, France had far fewer sources of news than did England, Holland or Germany. This led to the emergence of handwritten newsletters of Paris gossip, transcribed by dozens of copyists and sent by post to subscribers in Paris and beyond. The lack of a free press also meant that poems and songs passed around on scraps of paper, along with coffee-house gossip, were important sources of news for many Parisians.
Little wonder then that coffee-houses, like other public places in Paris, were stuffed with government spies. Anyone who spoke out against the state risked being hauled off to the Bastille, whose archives contain reports of hundreds of coffee-house conversations, noted down by informers. “At the Café de Foy someone said that the king had taken a mistress, that she was named Gontaut, and that she was a beautiful woman, the niece of the Duc de Noailles,” runs one report from the 1720s. Another, from 1749, reads, “Jean-Louis Le Clerc made the following remarks in the Café de Procope: that there never has been a worse king; that the court and the ministers make the king do shameful things, which utterly disgust his people.”
Those “who assembled day after day in the Café de Procope saw, with penetrating glance, in the depths of their black drink, the illumination of the year of the revolution”
Despite their reputation as breeding-grounds for discontent, coffee-houses seem to have been tolerated by the French government as a means of keeping track of public opinion. Yet it was at the Café de Foy, eyed by police spies while standing on a table brandishing two pistols, that Camille Desmoulins roused his countrymen with his historic appeal—“Aux armes, citoyens!”—on July 12th 1789. The Bastille fell two days later, and the French revolution had begun. Jules Michelet, a French historian, subsequently noted that those “who assembled day after day in the Café de Procope saw, with penetrating glance, in the depths of their black drink, the illumination of the year of the revolution.”
Can the coffee-houses' modern equivalent, the internet, claim to have had such an impact? Perhaps not. But the parallels are certainly striking. Originally the province of scientists, the internet has since grown to become a nexus of commercial, journalistic and political interchange.
In discussion groups and chatrooms, gossip passes freely—a little too freely, think some regulators and governments, which have tried and generally failed to rein them in. Snippets of political news are rounded up and analysed in weblogs, those modern equivalents of pamphlets and broadsides. Obscure scientific and medical papers, once available only to specialists, are just clicks away; many scientists explain their work, both to their colleagues and to the public at large, on web pages. Countless new companies and business models have emerged, not many of them successful, though one or two have become household names. Online exchanges and auction houses, from eBay to industry-specific marketplaces, match buyers and sellers of components, commodities and household bric-à-brac.
Coffee, meet WiFi
The kinship between coffee-houses and the internet has recently been underlined by the establishment of wireless “hotspots” which provide internet access, using a technology called WiFi, in modern-day coffee-shops. T-Mobile, a wireless network operator, has installed hotspots in thousands of Starbucks coffee-shops across America and Europe. Coffee-shop WiFi is particularly popular in Seattle—home to both Starbucks and such leading internet firms as Amazon and Microsoft.
Such hotspots allow laptop-toting customers to check their e-mail and read the news as they sip their lattes. But history provides a cautionary tale for those hotspot operators that charge for access. Coffee-houses used to charge for coffee, but gave away access to reading materials. Many coffee-shops are now following the same model, which could undermine the prospects for fee-based hotspots. Information, both in the 17th century and today, wants to be free—and coffee-drinking customers, it seems, expect it to be.
Back to top » - Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/12/2006
Suggestions to Maya:
1) Register as CND
2) Counting posting numbers
3) Publishing donators' name
4) Setting a special column for 交友择偶( 玛雅咖啡 Cupid)
- Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/12/2006
1.定期批准/否决新客人(以跟贴发贴为准)参加咖啡店讨论,
如果要做到这点就要升级现在的论坛,如果升级论坛我推荐VBB(vBulletin). - Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/13/2006
谢谢魔女的召唤。不过俺在江湖上哪里都是独来独往惯了。偶尔有点时间,大多也是和网友们开心起哄而已。倒哪里,就常把哪里搞得鸡飞狗跳。所以哪个委员会都从来没敢对我动过丝毫的招纳念头。:)
再说,我们这些网上的老家伙,江湖上混得久了,自己自在惯了。不需要网络委员会和特权。一进委员会,难免束手束脚。更麻烦的是,别的委员网上受了欺负,我这当大哥的还得出手打抱不平。那还不得累个半死。违了我散心的习惯。:)
- Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/13/2006
玛雅咖啡非常宽容,各位网管删贴时也都非常慎重。就是想让每一位客人都觉得受到欢迎,让自由的思想,好的文字可以抵达更多的人。
这里绝大多数客人都是谦谦君子,避免冲突常常沉默是金。一些偏激的意见有时倒成了显著的声音,一些低级玩笑也乘机泛滥。
我觉得玛雅无非是希望我们常来的客人有时间的话就多给一些反馈意见。玛雅咖啡是玛雅的,大家既然常来玩,就也是大家的。我们每个人都可以给它好的影响,让它成为自己喜欢的样子,为什么不呢:) - Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/13/2006
嗯。我最近也注意到笨笨满深刻的。是这个名字蒙住了我们的双眼。:)
除了对网上“沉默是金”表示不解,其它都叹为观止。:) - posted on 06/14/2006
不知道玛雅去过泡网(paowang.com)没有?如果要对咖啡进行改革,我个人以为可以参考一下它的做法。泡网的权利等级很明显,它分了几个大的版块,比琴、剑、音、色等,其中,要在琴、剑这两个最主要的版块取得发言权,只有几个途径,一是早先注册的会员,二是通过早先注册的会员介绍,然后经审核后特批,第三,也是最广泛的一点,就是靠在音、色等开放的版块多发些有质量的帖子,来挣取积分,最后才能取得在琴剑两个主版的发言权。泡网是因为它里面聚集了南方集团的一批传媒精英,所以整个论坛的质量较高,所以能吸引到网友去,一步一步挣得同样的发帖权。
个人意见,板砖轻砸。 - posted on 06/14/2006
嘿嘿,我不知怎地想起了居委会大妈们手持红袖章查卫生、罚随地吐痰的情景。
本来大家都是受过教育的人,这些管理制度是用不着的。相信不管大家在什么教育体制下,尊重他人、有礼有节都是共同的。对有些网友对他人恶言相伤、讽刺挖苦等变相“随地吐痰”的行为,大家采取避而不理也就罢了。正所谓“天下事了即未了,不如以不了了之。”再者,弗罗依德说“第一个扔侮辱性言辞而不是扔石块的人是人类文明的创始人。”那些网友虽不能再视为文明的创始人,但仍可视为“后现代”文明的继承发扬光大者,所以我们应给予相应的尊重及“创始人”等同的待遇。
正如有些网友曾经指出过的,许多时候问题不是“谈什么”,而是“怎么谈”。政治问题因为大家都置身其中,所以都可以谈、也愿意谈。但政治问题因为离大家最近,也是最容易导致语言功能不够用而以肢体语言加以延伸与扩展的问题。台湾及美国早期政客们在用大辩言辞无效之后,改用类“大便”语言,最后西洋拳与连环穿心腿并用便是明证。所以,如果大家都谈些“中国足球队勇夺世足杯”“基地战斗智擒布什”或“在美国成为中国一个省之后,原美国籍的人是否有资格参加省长竞选”之类虚无飘渺、与现实无关、遥远的、大家谁也不曾经历或不可能经历的事情,伤肝动火的情景或许会好些。
关于讨论、辩论的规则,大家可以阅读,比如 ARE WE SPIRITUAL MACHINES? RAY KURZWEIL VS. THE CRITICS OF STRONG A.I.,一类的书。这类书应该为大家在发表不同意见时如何表现提供一个样本。
(取下红袖章并把它交给下一个值班的人。)
玛雅 wrote:
在很多高档俱乐部里,新会员的申请必须得到全体会员的一致通过。在美国,co-op公寓,新的住户也要得到那栋楼的“居委会”同意之后才能搬进来。
咖啡店的质量是由咖啡店客人的素质决定的。为坚持当初的办店理念,我想筹备咖啡店管理委员会。除了已有的四个斑竹(玛雅、xw、阿姗、马慧元)之外,请咖啡店其他几位资深客人参加咖啡店的监管工作。
这个委员会的工作包括:
1. 定期批准/否决新客人(以跟贴发贴为准)参加咖啡店讨论,原则是少数服从多数;
2. 协助四位斑竹ZT好文好贴,积极发表看法
3. 积极协助四位斑竹的版务工作
4. 商讨咖啡店基金的使用、未来发展计划
5. 积极提供咖啡店经营管理意见
初步拟定增加以下文友为咖啡店委员:dinglin2,令胡冲、笨笨、花正好、KC,八十一子、方壶斋、fengzi,wenzhai。这些文友都是咖啡店的老客人。希望你们与我一起来维护咖啡店的品质。并请你们与我能用MSN来取得经常的联系。
玛雅的MSN地址:mayacafe@prodigy.net
- Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/15/2006
咖啡店里总有一两个自称为玛雅“老朋友”的。想来这老朋友是个喜欢开会的人,否则不会因为没有受到邀请,觉得玛雅不恭敬,不礼贤下士“老朋友”。
早说过,咖啡店是文友票友一起来维护的,我不觉得玛雅在任命谁,如果玛雅独断专行,那根本是删你没商量,管您是不是“老朋友”。这条线唯一新鲜的就是要对新客人审核,而不再是玛雅一个人说了算。“老朋友”是个新名字,您如果参加咖啡店的讨论,您的申请也是要经过我们同意的呢。
请老朋友今后讲话用咖啡店里的名字好吗?玛雅也会有交友不慎的时候。
- Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/15/2006
小花跟wenzhai的建议都好。问题是管理会繁琐一些。 我想用最简单的管理办法来管咖啡店,想测试在无注册制度下,我们能不能让这个地方维持下去,如果成功,那就是互联网的一个特例。
在大家都防贼防盗的世界里,我想看看夜不闭户能不能行,君子们总该有一小块地方世外桃源一会儿吧。 - Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/15/2006
穿别人的鞋,走自己的路,让他们找去吧
- posted on 06/16/2006
不觉得泡网好。比书话还糟糕。这哪里是些什么精英呢。
花正好 wrote:
不知道玛雅去过泡网(paowang.com)没有?如果要对咖啡进行改革,我个人以为可以参考一下它的做法。泡网的权利等级很明显,它分了几个大的版块,比琴、剑、音、色等,其中,要在琴、剑这两个最主要的版块取得发言权,只有几个途径,一是早先注册的会员,二是通过早先注册的会员介绍,然后经审核后特批,第三,也是最广泛的一点,就是靠在音、色等开放的版块多发些有质量的帖子,来挣取积分,最后才能取得在琴剑两个主版的发言权。泡网是因为它里面聚集了南方集团的一批传媒精英,所以整个论坛的质量较高,所以能吸引到网友去,一步一步挣得同样的发帖权。
个人意见,板砖轻砸。 - posted on 06/16/2006
没叫你来开会:)也没给你特权,不需要你打抱不平,就要你画勾画圈儿的,平时不烦你!
令胡冲 wrote:
谢谢魔女的召唤。不过俺在江湖上哪里都是独来独往惯了。偶尔有点时间,大多也是和网友们开心起哄而已。倒哪里,就常把哪里搞得鸡飞狗跳。所以哪个委员会都从来没敢对我动过丝毫的招纳念头。:)
再说,我们这些网上的老家伙,江湖上混得久了,自己自在惯了。不需要网络委员会和特权。一进委员会,难免束手束脚。更麻烦的是,别的委员网上受了欺负,我这当大哥的还得出手打抱不平。那还不得累个半死。违了我散心的习惯。:)
- Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/16/2006
"我想用最简单的管理办法来管咖啡店,想测试在无注册制度下,我们能不能让这个地方维持下去,如果成功,那就是互联网的一个特例。在大家都防贼防盗的世界里,我想看看夜不闭户能不能行,君子们总该有一小块地方世外桃源一会儿吧。"
玛雅是想用”无为而治“的方法来管理咖啡店,如果成功也是对”老子和庄子哲学思想的验证“。:-)
- Re: 筹备玛雅咖啡管理委员会posted on 06/17/2006
Fengzi wrote:
(取下红袖章并把它交给下一个值班的人。)
我接过风子的红袖章。。。
能注册还是注册的好,我是觉得能不考验大家就不要考验大家,能管不住自己就不要管住自己:) - posted on 06/17/2006
人在有闲的时候、在快乐的顶峰、在无人分享快乐、痛苦的时候才会常常为意义烦恼。
我时常为意义烦恼。老妈说我的聪明从来都用在最无意义的事上,越是无意义的事情我就越用心思。
办咖啡店有意义吗?我觉得起码比我写字有意义。我写的字怎么比都不如咖啡店里聚集起的这些朋友们更有意义。
花了一整天整理一千多封email。一半都是咖啡店朋友们的来信。这些信是我的意义。里面还有热情的捐款,我能公开你们的名字吗?
很长时间都没有写字了。甚至惊心动魄的中东游记也是零零散散。我没去看爱琴海。什么?你去土耳其,没去爱琴海?没去看特洛伊?没去看棉堡?疯了吗?
我再也不想一个人去旅行了。这样孤独的旅行我已经觉得毫无意义了。是的,大马士革有耶稣的足迹;是的, 土耳其的西海岸有最浪漫的爱琴海,有海伦的特洛伊城。但我一个人又有什么意义呢?
咖啡店若只是玛雅一个人的,那还有什么意义呢?
我不想一个人去旅行了。 我要带上老妈去埃及。我等待取保候审再次入监的判决:)
- posted on 06/17/2006
我等待取保候审再次入监的判决:) Why?
玛雅 wrote:
人在有闲的时候、在快乐的顶峰、在无人分享快乐、痛苦的时候才会常常为意义烦恼。
我时常为意义烦恼。老妈说我的聪明从来都用在最无意义的事上,越是无意义的事情我就越用心思。
办咖啡店有意义吗?我觉得起码比我写字有意义。我写的字怎么比都不如咖啡店里聚集起的这些朋友们更有意义。
花了一整天整理一千多封email。一半都是咖啡店朋友们的来信。这些信是我的意义。里面还有热情的捐款,我能公开你们的名字吗?
很长时间都没有写字了。甚至惊心动魄的中东游记也是零零散散。我没去看爱琴海。什么?你去土耳其,没去爱琴海?没去看特洛伊?没去看棉堡?疯了吗?
我再也不想一个人去旅行了。这样孤独的旅行我已经觉得毫无意义了。是的,大马士革有耶稣的足迹;是的, 土耳其的西海岸有最浪漫的爱琴海,有海伦的特洛伊城。但我一个人又有什么意义呢?
咖啡店若只是玛雅一个人的,那还有什么意义呢?
我不想一个人去旅行了。 我要带上老妈去埃及。我等待取保候审再次入监的判决:)
- Re: 玛雅咖啡管理posted on 06/21/2006
请新来的朋友尊重咖啡店的传统,用象样的名字来参加讨论。来咖啡店里都算是朋友,匿名的蒙面人,相信在哪个圈子里都不会受欢迎的。
Please paste HTML code and press Enter.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation