��Reader86
Paste HTML code and press Enter.
- Posted by SF04/09 on 04/08/2008. Reader86 commented 3 times.
- Posted by Ï«Ï« on 03/31/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] ¡¾±¿Ê«çù»¡¿ÃÎPosted by ±¿±¿ on 03/31/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- Posted by abc on 03/31/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- Posted by ÀÏÍß on 03/22/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] ºúÄÖÒôÀÖ»áPosted by liaokang on 03/22/2008. Reader86 commented 4 times.
- Posted by Reader86 on 03/22/2008. Reader86 commented 3 times.
- Posted by °¢æ© on 03/22/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- Posted by July on 03/21/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] ?¶ÀÉÆÕ«Ö÷? ·¿¿Í£Ç£¸Posted by July on 03/21/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- Posted by Ñ©Àò²©Ê¿ on 03/21/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.The logic in the article is not very strict. It's too stretchy for some generalizations. ÀÏÍâhere should only be those who have special experiences and special knowledge, not every ÀÏÍâ. When a ÀÏÍâÈ¢ non-ÀÏÍâÅ®ÈË, it is a indication that he's looking for security (except Love at First Sight). ΪʲôÀÏÍâ¶àÈ¢Öйú³óÅ®ÈË? Because if ÀÏÍâÈ¢ÖйúbeautifulÅ®ÈË, there is no security. ÖйúbeautifulÅ®ÈËwill sooner or later run away, if there is a possibility for her to run (Murphy's law isn't it?). There is
- [RE:] ÁíÀࡰŵ±´½±¡± (ZT)Posted by Reader86 on 03/21/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] [¹àË®]ÊʺÏÈ¡ÃûµÄººÓïPosted by mahuiyuan on 03/20/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] ¿ÉÒÔÕý³£ÉÏ¿§·ÈÁË£¡Posted by abc on 03/18/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.
- [RE:] Ñô´ºÈýÔÂ-- ¸øÆßÔÂPosted by ¹ϣ on 03/17/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.
- [RE:] ´ßÃÎ²Ý - MugwortPosted by lucy on 03/16/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] ÊDz»ÊÇÎÒµÄÎÊÌ⣿Posted by Reader86 on 03/16/2008. Reader86 commented 4 times.
- [RE:] Third time is the charmPosted by ¸¡Éú on 03/16/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] Lang Lang vs Yundi LiPosted by zt on 03/15/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- Posted by wenzhai on 03/13/2008. Reader86 commented 3 times.×ö¹ÉƱͶ×ÊÍêÈ«½²¿Æѧ? What kind of ¿Æѧ it is? I would like to learn. :-), :-), :-)... If ¹ÉƱͶ×ÊÍêÈ«½²¿Æѧ, making money is easy. I thought science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method, which includes hypothesis testing, falsifying, and etc... So much for the famous economist...:-), :-), :-)...
- Posted by СÂü on 03/13/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.Xiaoman, 1, You sounds there is something (or someone) bothers you, that rat implies. What it is only yourself know. 2, You have too much time to idle. You watched two movies in one day. 3, You are young. You are my envy. I don't mind sitting in a spacious living room on a weekend tranquil day and felt sorry for myself. It's actually very romantic. There was a time in my life, I indeed felt the same as you did now--getting up from the bed and felt empty. I thought of those days now, and in
- [RE:] ŦԼÖݳ¤Ì¹³ÐÕÙ¼ËPosted by ZT on 03/12/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- Posted by Àäľ on 03/11/2008. Reader86 commented once.¿àÉ©, Is this your first time to take part in an election? I did that a few years back. I was as enthusiastic as you are right now. But now, I don't even care. It is the same as when I first entered US, I was so and so... but now, I have seen more, and was calmed down. Whoever promises whatever, he/she would not do whatsoever once you send him/her there. You will be disappointed forever. The pressure all around will make no much difference whoever elected, America is America, it will never change
- [RE:] Â̲軹ݶþÏßPosted by greentea on 03/08/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] ¡¾³¤»°¶Ì˵¡¿Posted by ±¿±¿ on 03/08/2008. Reader86 commented 4 times.Can "ºÚ°µ" Åçíç? No, once "ºÚ°µ" Åçíç, it never "ºÚ°µ" again (ËûÈô̽Éí, ±ãÊǾ¡Í·, nice, nice, nice...). If my understanding correct, it is a very interesting poem. Can "ҹɫ" be omitted in this sentence "ËûÈÔ²»ÈÌʧȥҹɫ?" Because if "Ëû" is "ºÚ°µ," "ҹɫ" is redundant. Just a suggestion, I might be wrong... The poem might imply something deeper, and funnier (but of course, every poem can be read in a million ways). Think something that can Åçíç, and can cause »¯Ê¯ÀïÒÑÓÐÓã¹ÇÔÚ¶¯, and »ÒÍÁµØÒ²½¥´Î·
- Posted by shangnengfan on 03/05/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.If it is not "Love at first sight," or "Love at second sight" either, what is that called? Do you have love at Nth sight?" :-), :-), :-)... I can't Love at first sight, because I can never know people at first sight, nor can I Love at second sight because I would never go back to the one I have already given up.
- [RE:] ¡¶Ã¬¶ÜÂÛ¡·¶Áºó¸ÐPosted by ÖìÀϽ£¿Í on 02/29/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.ÖìÀÏ: Sorry, I beg to differ. The way you criticized ¡¶Ã¬¶ÜÂÛ¡·sounds that you didn't understand dialectics at all. People tried to memorize it as the circumstances required they so, but understanding is the key. Forget Mao, he himself may not understand dialectics either, or understand it in a philosophic sense. If you try to understand dialectics, please read Engels himself, or scholars' introductions. You may understand it better and even easier. Dialectics is nothing but the law of chang
- Posted by moab on 02/17/2008. Reader86 commented once.
- [RE:] Ҳ˵˵ÃÀ¹úµÄǹ֧ÎÊÌâPosted by qinggang on 02/17/2008. Reader86 commented 2 times.
- Posted by ÊØÍû¹Åµä on 02/14/2008. Reader86 commented 5 times.
(c) 2010 Maya Chilam Foundation