／mf

Even though you are no less 愤青 than anybody I know on CND and here, I feel it's just your freedom to say whatever you want. This posting, looking at the words,嘴脸,嘴里喊, really reminds me of the “两报一刊”.

with trashes you have moved to this site, I thought I navigated to People's Daily or Sohu, or Sina. If you don't have anything to share with other people, why not just keep silent, just as many other people do?

hehe, WOA needs to read more carefully.

Such projects in China in this time benefit no ordinary people other than you, in a way you have just described.

someone here is much envied. Why not go for the 大南瓜?

One word shows your narrow-mindedness. I don't see a bright future of China in people like you. Also, in 2030, when China's GDP is no.1 in the world, what's the rank of the GDP per capita, which is more meaningful, and what's its rank in the world? In my opinon, China's GDP absolute number should have been the no.1 today, if Mao and CCP did not cause those disasters in the 40 years after the end of WWII. Just look at Janpan. 民主,人权等伟大的思想已被美国为首的西方政治强奸得不行了. Yo

One of the reasons a lot of people stick to the green house model and do not want to listen to other scientific models about global warming probably is because Bush does not believe the green house model, who in a lot of peoples' eyes is an idiot. As someone with an advanced science degree, I have been so surprised that many people, including many with background in science and technology, are so easy taking scientific models and assumptions as facts. I personally think that some issues are too big in sc

You are "高考的收益者", you 感恩, how about those victims of CCP revolutions in past tens of years? and when one day you unfortunately become a victim in your life, what are you going to do?

OMG, now you are a star in a brilliant web forum.

I wonder how sophisticated and profound those who say others shallow are?

When you are serious, you get something like this, which are really good points. The example of Mao is not good, though: I never heard of this saying:毛泽东一辈子就没安过好心做过好事. Actually, Mao never intended anything bad. He had just done all things bad, no matter what he intended.

cheap shot？Excuse me, I don't think you get it. If as a pure poem, it has no value for discussing at all...just ask the poets here. What's more cheap? I believe that, 自立, who lives in Beijing, was laughing at you bunch of oversea Chinese going kind of cheerful for such a little stuff, so trivial to the things he has been concerned and faced with for tens of years... As for me, I place Wen in line with Hu Yaobang and Zhao Zhiyang, as those GCD leaders with, less or more, humanism thinking. Howe

this Chinese word “自以为是”exacts this guanzhong. How do you think Mr Zili is 独愤, and more ridiculously, you think you know "众心"? "精英独自言", just as"逢中必反", is a typical GCD propaganda on those Chinese dissents. Again, if you could speak for yourself with some intelligence, people would think at least you are sincere and intelligent, no matter what your social or political opinions are. In this regard, there is a great example in this forum: QingGang.

As a consistent CND reader, never did I read anything that's "hatred to China". However, it indeed publishes a lot of articles that are critical of the Chinese government, and the dark side of Chinese society, which is exactly what CND, as an independent and intellectual online media, should do, and exactly one of reasons why I have been reading it for years. Of course, this is not what some oversea Chinese like to read. Well, there is a Chinese newspaper in the states named People's Daily for them.

I don't see any inteligence in guanzhong, who is very typical of those who say "逢中必反". He lives out of China, but often shows his anger on the anti-CGD feeling of those living in China.

If I could express my feeling, I'd say that the most respected (by me, of course) visitors ever coming to this site are those from mainland China: Zili, Qige, 沈默克, 花正好，守望古典，also 小曼，just name a few.